Hair Transplant with DHI Method: How Does It Differ from FUE and FUT?

Hair transplant procedures have evolved significantly over the years, offering various techniques to address hair loss. Among these techniques, DHI (Direct Hair Implantation) has emerged as a popular choice. In this blog post, we will explore how the DHI method differs from two other commonly used techniques: FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction) and FUT (Follicular Unit Transplantation).

1. DHI Method Overview:

DHI is a hair transplant technique that involves the direct implantation of hair follicles into the recipient area using a specialized tool called a Choi implanter pen. Unlike FUE and FUT, which require the creation of recipient sites prior to implantation, DHI allows for simultaneous extraction and implantation of hair follicles, resulting in a more efficient and precise procedure.

2. FUE Technique:

FUE is another popular hair transplant method where individual hair follicles are extracted from the donor area and then implanted into the recipient area manually or with the help of a micro-punch tool. Unlike DHI, FUE does not involve the use of an implanter pen for implantation, which can result in a longer procedure time and potentially less precise placement of grafts.

3. FUT Technique:

FUT, also known as strip harvesting, involves the surgical removal of a strip of scalp tissue from the donor area, which is then dissected into individual follicular units for transplantation. While FUT can yield a high number of grafts in a single session, it leaves a linear scar at the donor site, which may be visible with short haircuts. DHI, on the other hand, does not leave a linear scar since it involves individual extraction of follicles.

Key Differences:

• DHI allows for direct implantation of hair follicles without the need for recipient site creation, unlike FUE and FUT.

• DHI utilizes a specialized Choi implanter pen for precise and simultaneous extraction and implantation of follicles.

• DHI results in minimal scarring compared to FUT, which leaves a linear scar at the donor site.

• DHI may offer a faster procedure time compared to FUE, as the implantation process is streamlined.

In conclusion, while FUE and FUT are effective hair transplant methods, DHI offers several advantages, including minimal scarring, precise implantation, and potentially faster procedure times. Choosing the right technique depends on individual factors such as hair loss pattern, donor hair availability, and aesthetic goals.

For more information or to schedule a consultation for a hair transplant with the DHI method, feel free to contact us.